The Method applied to
The Method applied to Contemporary art
Contemporary art carries extreme counterfeit pressure — established names are systematically faked, and market fashion can multiply or erase value in months. The method reads three layers: the piece's coherence (materials, technique, signature consistency with the artist's verified work), the context (why this price, why this venue, why now), and timing (record chasing versus fresh discovery). Output: risk level, what to verify before paying, and your Discipline Ceiling — the maximum you can pay without losing, not what the piece is worth.
The Method's take
Contemporary art obeys the timing-is-the-biggest-fake law with violence: a piece bought after its record defrauds you like a forgery — chase the next record, never the past one. Fashion is manufactured by big players who accumulate first and mythologize after; buy it only cheap and sell it fast, because uniqueness is patrimony but fashion is rotation. The affordable-loss rule is non-negotiable: above the loss you can absorb, a written opinion from a recognized expert (foundation, catalog raisonné committee, archive) comes before purchase — the market pays certification, not your correctness. For technique, material aging, pigment analysis, and signature forensics: verify with a category expert and cross-check against the artist's authenticated catalog.
The math
A mis-attributed contemporary piece bought at €15,000–50,000 without expert pre-clearance typically costs the full price plus years of litigation or silent loss; even a €3,000–8,000 mistake on a smaller name compounds when you hold dead stock paying rent instead of cash buying the next piece. The 24-hour pass is €100 (annual €3,800) — the dossier that flags the three questions to ask before paying costs less than one tank of fuel, and the mistake it prevents pays for a decade of access.
One question answered here saved you a mistake. The engine answers yours — the exact object, the exact number.
Ask the engine — 24h pass €100